I want to share a brilliant post by Jamal Johnson in the group Freedoms Royal Sanctuary. Would love to hear your response to his questions.
"In a thread regarding the lack of masculinity on the stage at the recent FFWPU's so-called "Blessing" event, Dan Fefferman made the incredible statement...
"What's stupid is not to see the powerful masculine presence of True Father, as well as the feminine presence of True Mother in this ceremony."
Thomas Byrne then says -
[[[[ Look, here's the model. We have the example of Father giving a blessing to a group about 1974. Mother was not available (thank goodness, or we might not have a concrete example) so did Father 1. Give it by himself? 2. Or use a picture of TM? Instead he chose a daughter, I believe it was Ye jin to stand in Mother's place. So the standard is set, Mother must use a son to stand in Father's place as he used a daughter to stand in her place. This is the precedence Father set. With this example it is clear to me someone must represent Father. It can't just be "in the spirit". ]]]]
Then I pointed out that Thomas' question should be answered. "What powerful masculine presence of Father is to be seen on that stage?" so Dan writes...
[[[[ "Let him whose eyes are open see." If you are determined to deny that TM and TF are united... well, then you won't see. ]]]]
Then I said to Dan Fefferman the following
[[[[ OKAY! Here is where the principle of resemblance has its greatest significance. So lets begin
Even if father was present with mother spiritually, it's not enough to set the minimum conditions necessary to establish the "conveying of God's Blessing" moment.
In order to establish the "conveying of God's Blessing" moment, parents must be on earth so that the new reality exists in the spiritual world.
See I think all Han supporters are so ignorant, that they wouldn't even think to ask why father never conducted a blessing by himself. It's because father knows the minimum conditions that must be bound on earth to have the result registered in heaven.
Both Father and Mother are there in bodily form giving the blessing. As your physical eyes witness this, your spirit can rightly register the vitality elements into your soul.
This is why the term "What's bound on earth is bound in heaven" is an immutable impassable eternally indispensable axiom.
It is every single one of you Han supporters that cannot see that. ]]]]
SO my question is...
We believe that individual embodiments of Truth are necessary for God's purpose of creation and Joy. And we believe that Jesus' need for a manifested bride on earth, prolonged the providence another 1887 years (from year 33 to 1920). So with all the historical necessity for "manifestation", do you now believe that the manifestation of two parents is unnecessary? for the bequeathing of the blessing?
Another way of asking this question is this. Do you believe that God gets the same benefit from a couple who has lost one physical body (male or female), as He does from a couple that both exist bodily on earth?
I WILL REPEAT THE 2 QUESTIONS
With all the historical necessity for "manifestation", do you now believe that the manifestation of two parents is unnecessary? for the bequeathing of the blessing?
Do you believe that God gets the same benefit from a couple who has lost one physical body (male or female), as He does from a couple that both exist bodily on earth?"
"What's stupid is not to see the powerful masculine presence of True Father, as well as the feminine presence of True Mother in this ceremony."
Thomas Byrne then says -
[[[[ Look, here's the model. We have the example of Father giving a blessing to a group about 1974. Mother was not available (thank goodness, or we might not have a concrete example) so did Father 1. Give it by himself? 2. Or use a picture of TM? Instead he chose a daughter, I believe it was Ye jin to stand in Mother's place. So the standard is set, Mother must use a son to stand in Father's place as he used a daughter to stand in her place. This is the precedence Father set. With this example it is clear to me someone must represent Father. It can't just be "in the spirit". ]]]]
Then I pointed out that Thomas' question should be answered. "What powerful masculine presence of Father is to be seen on that stage?" so Dan writes...
[[[[ "Let him whose eyes are open see." If you are determined to deny that TM and TF are united... well, then you won't see. ]]]]
Then I said to Dan Fefferman the following
[[[[ OKAY! Here is where the principle of resemblance has its greatest significance. So lets begin
Even if father was present with mother spiritually, it's not enough to set the minimum conditions necessary to establish the "conveying of God's Blessing" moment.
In order to establish the "conveying of God's Blessing" moment, parents must be on earth so that the new reality exists in the spiritual world.
See I think all Han supporters are so ignorant, that they wouldn't even think to ask why father never conducted a blessing by himself. It's because father knows the minimum conditions that must be bound on earth to have the result registered in heaven.
Both Father and Mother are there in bodily form giving the blessing. As your physical eyes witness this, your spirit can rightly register the vitality elements into your soul.
This is why the term "What's bound on earth is bound in heaven" is an immutable impassable eternally indispensable axiom.
It is every single one of you Han supporters that cannot see that. ]]]]
SO my question is...
We believe that individual embodiments of Truth are necessary for God's purpose of creation and Joy. And we believe that Jesus' need for a manifested bride on earth, prolonged the providence another 1887 years (from year 33 to 1920). So with all the historical necessity for "manifestation", do you now believe that the manifestation of two parents is unnecessary? for the bequeathing of the blessing?
Another way of asking this question is this. Do you believe that God gets the same benefit from a couple who has lost one physical body (male or female), as He does from a couple that both exist bodily on earth?
I WILL REPEAT THE 2 QUESTIONS
With all the historical necessity for "manifestation", do you now believe that the manifestation of two parents is unnecessary? for the bequeathing of the blessing?
Do you believe that God gets the same benefit from a couple who has lost one physical body (male or female), as He does from a couple that both exist bodily on earth?"
No comments:
Post a Comment